Why what you cook changes what you need to insure
Two food trailers of identical value can be very different risks, and the difference is usually the menu. Fryers, gas and cold storage each pull the policy in a particular direction.
Fryers and gas drive the fire conversation
Hot oil and LPG in a confined space is the defining hazard of mobile food, and it is why these units are underwritten differently from other light commercials. Insurers ask about gas certification, extinguishers, suppression and how the system is isolated when travelling.
A menu without deep frying is a materially different risk, and it is worth saying so rather than being priced against the category average.
Cold chain drives the spoilage conversation
If your menu depends on refrigeration, a compressor failure overnight can destroy your stock and cancel a weekend of trading. Machinery breakdown with a spoilage extension is what responds, and it is elected rather than automatic.
In an Australian summer this matters more than the premium difference suggests, particularly for operators running to a market schedule with no second unit.
The menu drives the products liability conversation
If someone becomes ill, that is products liability rather than public liability. Allergens, raw proteins and anything held at temperature raise the stakes, and food safety practice becomes part of the risk rather than just compliance.
Confirm products cover is included rather than assuming the liability section covers everything. It usually is bundled, but given what you sell it is worth checking rather than assuming.
Cover this article touches on
Get a quote
Tell us what you run and how it earns. It takes about a minute, and we come back to you with your options.
Start a quoteOr call 1300 080 323.
Any advice on this website is general advice only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on it, consider whether it is appropriate for you and read the relevant Product Disclosure Statement (PDS).